100 days and counting at the Ormiston Horizon Academy

550 purple and blue balloons are to be released at the Orimston Horizon Academy next Wednesday to celebrate 100 days until the start of the Olympics.

Athlete and Olympic prospect Emma Jackson will release the balloons at the event with each balloon symbolising an individual child at the academy.

A mini Olympics with students from the academy and local primary schools will also take place during the day with Emma presenting the prizes. In the afternoon, from 4pm, the sporting facilities will be opened up to the local community with a hog roast, music and free sports activities. There will also be the opportunity for residents to sample, for free activities, including Zumba, football, boxing, basketball and swimming. Fitzy Fox, the mascot from a scheme designed to encourage children to adopt a healthy lifestyle, will also be present. Continue reading

New Sponsor For The James Brindley Academy

NHS Stoke-on-Trent has stepped down as lead sponsor for the proposed James Brindley Academy and is to be replaced by the Ormiston Trust.

Following the publication of the Department of Health White Paper which proposes to abolish Primary Care Trusts by April 2013 Stoke-on-Trent Primary Care Trust (NHS Stoke-on-Trent) has decided to step down as lead sponsor on the proposed James Brindley Academy project in Stoke-on-Trent.

NHS Stoke-on-Trent made this difficult decision to ensure the project can continue forward without any doubts about the sponsorship and so that business could continue as normal for everyone involved.

The Department for Education has agreed that the Ormiston Trust already the sponsor of the Ormiston Sir Stanley Matthews Academy which replaced Blurton High School this September, can become the lead sponsor. Ormiston Trust will work with NHS Stoke-on-Trent and Keele University as strategic partners to deliver the new academy to the current timescales.

A non-profit organisation, Ormiston Trust first sponsored Gateway Academy in Thurrock in 2006, and now sponsors eleven academies across the UK, four of which opened this September in East Anglia, Stoke-on-Trent and Cheshire.

Ormiston Trust’s Managing Director Joyce Hodgetts commented: “We are delighted to become the sponsor of the proposed James Brindley Academy. Ormiston is committed to improving the life chances of young people as demonstrated by the excellent recent results of our 7 existing academies. We are very proud of the sustained success of the work we do and look forward to the staff, students and parents being a part of this.”

Chris Dawes, Chairman of NHS Stoke-on-Trent, stated: “Despite the change in status following the Health White Paper everybody at NHS Stoke-on-Trent remains committed to the vision of the new academy at James Brindley and are eager to work with Ormiston Trust and Keele University to make the vision a reality.”

The Academy will continue to have Science and Health as specialisms, and Clive Rigby will continue to be Principal Designate.

In addition, the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) funding for the new academy was secured last month and the work to translate the education vision into an early design has been progressing throughout the summer.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council cabinet member for children and youing people’s services, Cllr. Debra Gratton, said: “Obviously we’re disappointed the NHS Stoke-on-Trent won’t be able to continue as the lead sponsor but they will still have involvement with the new academy and we’re delighted that Ormiston Trust have agreed to take over. I would like to assure pupils, staff and the local community that this will in no way affect the timetable for the building of the new academy.”

Building work on the new academy is due to begin in September 2011 with pupils moving into the new school two years later. However, the Academy is still on course to open in existing buildings in September 2011.


By Matt Taylor

Last night, in an emotional meeting at the Britannia stadium held to consult over the proposed Academy to replace Blurton and Trentham High, parents made their position known with a show of hands ““ with all but one of around 150 people voting against the plans. Unfortunately, it wasn’t a vote that would count for anything other than to establish the opinion of people in the room.

The conference was held so that the proposed sponsor of the new institution, Ormiston Trust, could consult with parents to give them more information about how the Academy would work. But frustrated parents, governors, councillors and even one pupil were, after feeling their views had been ignored before, not interested in the details, but in telling the panel in no uncertain terms that they were “not wanted”.

Rousing speeches from worried family-members and elected representatives alike were greeted with undivided cheers befitting of the venue from the crowd.

But Get Rowney, Director of Children and Young People’s Services for Stoke-on-Trent remained adamant, and near the end of proceedings came out with the audacious comment, “this is the problem with people in Stoke” as he retorted that the angry people in the room just wanted “further delays”.

On the panel with Mr Rowney was Bernard Dickinson, principal at the Ormiston Community Academy in Sheffield, Ian Cleland, Chief Executive of Ormiston Trust, and the head of S-O-T communications Dan Barton, who chaired proceedings.

Mr Dickinson was there (one parent said as a “lamb to the slaughter”) to explain how successful his academy has been, but was received with mocking laughter when it transpired that the results he was quoting were about his school which has only been open since this January.

And Mr Cleland explained how he could transform under-performing schools in deprived areas into successful organisations. But this was met with annoyance by parents, one of whom demanded “what can you do for places which aren’t performing badly?”, since Trentham High actually has a better record than any of Ormiston’s academies do currently.

There was an obvious sense of resentment in the room, with a “Ëœthem and us’ situation between the panel and their 150 adversaries developing. Ian, a parent at Ash Green, which is a feeder school for Trentham High, asked:

“Could you explain how this consultation works? 1344 comments against and four of support was the result of the last consultation. But it wasn’t taken into account. And Mark Meredith said we were the minority trying to “derail” the plans. Is this time different?”

Ged Rowney’s response was to say that the complaints had all been “fed into the Executive and Members Board (EMB)”. And when asked why they had been ignored, parents were dished out with the same retort that this was the decision of the elected representatives, none on whom were present to be accountable for their decisions.

Karen Pate, who has a daughter at Ash Green primary and at Trentham High, said:

“I’d like to put forward a formal complaint that we don’t have our portfolio-holder here. We did invite him. But he is not able to make it. Will an academy improve things? Evidence does not support that it does. None of the academies out-perform Trentham.

“We came up with a cooperative solution run by a community. It was granted on the Friday and rescinded three days later.”

Terry Follows, councillor for Trentham and Hanford and a Governor at Trentham High, the Priory and Ash Green, said:

“Can I just dispel that the council wants academies. It is the [elected] mayor who is supporting these academies. Blurton people don’t want an academy ““ you hear this Mr Rowney? They want their school rebuilt.

“Why should parents take a risk with an unproven school? It doesn’t make sense. There is no reason to have five academies in Stoke-on-Trent, no reason at all.”

Julian, a parent with one child at Trentham and one on the way there, said:

“We have a 47 percent national average for passes of A to C in GCSE. Stoke is 36 percent, and the academies’ average is below 30. How can you even dream that you will get to the 57 percent we have at Trentham?

“You will have a brand spanking building and it will be empty ““ because we will take our children elsewhere.”

And it wasn’t just Trentham parents that were against the academy. At this meeting, it became clear that there is considerable discontent at the Blurton camp as well. One unhappy Blurton mum commented:

“My daughter is in year 8. She has gone from the bottom to the top of the class. All we want is a new school on the current site, with better equipment for the teachers.”

As Bernard Dickinson explained how this brings his school the opportunity of half-a-million pounds in extra funding a year, and that £23 million can provide a different environment for learning, he came up against the suggestion, “well just give us the money”, which really sums up the sentiment of all of the parents, pupils and governors who were present.

These parents are happy with the environment they are in. They simply want new facilities with new technology. The resounding message which came out of last night’s events was that all they want in Blurton is a new school on the same plot, while Trentham families would be happy with a refurbishment. And councillor Brian Ward was optimistic that an imminent change in the city’s political make-up could make this a possibility. He said:

“This is a decision being pushed through politically by the [elected] mayor.  The mayor leaves office in June (which received cheers from the crowd). If the political make-up does change, and Terry Follows has supported this, we will be fighting on your behalf. We believe we could get new schools built and your school left in your community.”

A seven-strong group of protesters against the closure of Trentham High are to cycle from Westminster – where they walked to deliver their petition last year – to Strasbourg next month, in order to hand the document to MEPs at the European Parliament. Two of the group are grandparents in their 60s. Check Pits’n’Pots-The Radical Press for more on this story soon.