About Shaun Bennett

I'm a voice of geniune right-wing Conservatism in Stoke-on-Trent.

Cameron’s use of the Veto did Britain Proud

If you have read Bill Cawley’s article on the site about David Cameron’s
use of the veto at EU negotiations last week, you’d be forgiven for
thinking that the city might cease to exist as a viable entity at any
moment solely as a result of Mr Cameron’s actions. I’m afraid that Bill’s
piece was of course entirely wrong, biased and misleading-and deliberately
so, as he openly admits in the first paragraph, he has been an apologist
for the EU since the project was first devised in the backrooms by
politicians with a plan to create a new superstate all those many years
ago.

It’s not going to do anyone any good for me to start having a go at Bill
for his support of the EU project because we all know the arguments, we
all have out views and I doubt anything we say here will change them on
either side of the debate. Neither am going to get into his absurd talk
about the dangers of withdrawal because-much as many of us might like it,
and much as we know it would benefit the country-that was not on the
agenda at this summit.

So what does it boil down to? EU nations-excluding Britain-will be able to
hold secret meetings on how to prop up their all or nothing Euro project.
Not exactly the biggest disaster to have befallen our country I’d have
thought, since as one of the few country’s to have taken the very wise
decision to stay OUTSIDE the Euro we had little or no real influence on
the development of that particular folly anyway.

Second, EU countries-excluding Britain-will now have to submit their
budgets to the approval of unelected EU beaurocrats and face tough
controls on their debt and public spending plans. As was pointed out in
the House of Commons on Monday, if Britain had signed up to such an
arrangement it would actually render the policies of the Labour Party here
in the UK completely illegal as the bonkers plans of Miliband and Balls is
to further increase the debt and spend even more public money to boost the
economy. Presumably, Bill Cawley and all the other socialists that have
cheered him would think such an arrangement intolerable. Indeed,
Stoke-on-Trent would have been very hard and very directly hit if David
Cameron HAD signed up to such an agreement last week. perhaps that’s why
behind the public protests, even Mr Miliband is now accepting that he
would have done precisely the same thing and used the veto in Mr Cameron’s
place.

Third, the EU wanted to put regulations and restrictions onto financial
transactions 80% of which take place in the City of London. It would
effectively have been a special City of London tax designed to EXPORT jobs
and business from the UK to the continent, propping up their Eurozone
project but hitting the UK economy very hard indeed. Bill Cawley gives us
all the usual socialist propaganda about banker bashing and City of London
spivs receiving unfair protection, but lets be quite clear that the City
of London creates jobs and creates wealth that all of us mere mortals rely
upon for our country’s economic stability and well-being. Cameron would
have been an absolute fool to have agreed to the sort of regulations that
the EU were proposing.

Bill talks a good talk about the plight of the ordinary person who is
already hurting thanks to the economic catastrophe that we inherited from
Gordon Brown. But will Bill do more than offer tea and sympathy to those
people who would be made unemployed here in Stoke-on-Trent if the very
regulations he has written in defence of had been agreed by David Cameron
last week? I think not.

At the end of the day, the most important thing that a British Prime
Minister is charged with is defending the British national interest and
security. We must not allow swivel-eyed Euro obsessive’s across all
parties and none to mesmerize us into agreeing to everything the EU
demands even if it is against our own national interest. To be honest, not
many of us give a damn about the well-being of France and Germany when it
is our own people who are hurting. They look after themselves and so must
we.

We cannot sacrifice our national interest on the alter of Europeanism just
so that our leaders can say that they are at the heart of the EU project
and exercise some mythical ‘influence’ that cannot really be defined. And
ANY politician or activist who says otherwise should condemn themselves.

My Worries About The Future Of the City

Why I worry that the City may suffer for a long time as a result of the
election results last week

Well the elections are all over now and the new council team are firmly in
place. We’re hearing the traditional post-election fine words about a
better tomorrow, everbody pulling together, a team that is second to none
etc etc.

I do wish Mohammed Pervez and his Labour cabinet well. They have a lot of
tough choices to make and they’re going to find it difficult when the
reality starts to bite. Blaming the Westminster coalition of Mr Cameron
may have got Labour through the short-term local elections, but it will
simply not be good enough as a long term strategy when they are having to
vote for service cuts and tax rises over the coming months and years.

So we’re all well aware of the crisis that the city faces financially,
culturally and politically and we are going to be talking a lot about that
in the future. But the city now faces a longer-term crisis because of the
election results the other week that most people probably will not even
pick up on until it is too late. I am talking about nothing less than a
crisis of our local democracy.

Because of the decisions the electorate made the other week, councillors
of vast experience were ejected from office from all parties. The
rottweilers who would have held this Labour council to account have almost
all gone. We have the most inexperienced council of our lifetimes.

In most cases, the electorate did not consider for a single moment
candidates experience, performance or suitability for the job. Councillors
were ejected whether they were good, bad or indifferent. It made very
little difference if you had spent the last 4 years working the ward and
knocking on doors, or whether you sat on your backside in the town hall
all day and never spoke to a single voter. The single consideration it
seems that the electorate made was whether the candidates were Labour or
not Labour, and then they put their cross unthinkingly in the Labour box.
It was of course very frustrating and dissapointing…unless you were
Labour.

But now we have a problem. Roll on four years time (with a general
election most probably on the same day, and you only have to look back to
2010 to see how Labour will sweep the board in that case) and things start
to look very bad for organised opposition to Labour in the City of
Stoke-on-Trent. Without a single councillor to fly their flag, the Lib
Dems will not be back on the council any time soon and with no local
elections now for four years, there will be little incentive for any party
to keep their campaign machine busy.

As a longtime Conservative activist, I know what state the local party was
already in before these elections. With no reason to keep their
campaigners and activists busy-and with Cllr Abi Brown (who has
revolutionised local campaigning) due to step down as Chairman of the
local party early next year-I really do worry that we may be witnessing
the end of that local party in any meaningful sense outside of perhaps
Trentham and Meir Park. The local party has come to rely heavily on
student campaigners in recent years (based at Keele), and most of these
will now begin to gravitate away from Stoke politics naturally (remember
that Newcastle will continue to hold annual elections and much of the Tory
campaign focus will now shift there).

And the older, more battle-hardened activists may go the same way. Former
councillors Clive Brian and Ross Irving will in all probability not stand
for office again. John Daniels, disillusioned with Stoke, has decided to
leave the city (and I can’t honestly blame him). Is Hazel Lyth and Joanne
Powell-Beckett really going to hang around for the next four years
attending pointless local party meetings and working for the party until
the next local election (again, and I can’t emphasise this enough,
probably on the same day as a general election!).

Will the Lib Dems-now without a single seat on the council-really be back
so soon? Will the various Independents who have had their fingers burnt by
the electorate and now feeling dejected and demoralised see any reason to
carry on in local politics? The BNP will always be there of course, but
one feels that their heyday has passed for the time being. Now facing a
decade in the wilderness, I doubt they will be able to muster much by way
of campaigning in the years to come.

ALL parties and none (bar Labour) suffered at the hands of the electorate.
All are now broken and demoralised. It will not be an easy path back for
any of them. I doubt many will be able to field as many candidates in four
years time as they did this year. So what does that leave us? An all
powerful Labour Party, the most inexperienced in history facing the
greatest challenges in our history. A Labour Party with absolute power.
Only a token opposition in the town hall and barely none outside it.

The lack of opposition means very little so close to Labour’s fantastic
victory. But as the years go by, as the cuts start to bite, as mistakes
are made, as the shine starts to go from this Labour council people will
start to ask why there isn’t any opposition. And when the next local
elections come round and people find they have no credible opposition
candidates in most of the wards, people will be asking why. And in a
decade, two decades and three decades when people start to ask where the
opposition to Labour is…answer there will come back none.

This is what the electorate have chosen. This is the City they have
created. If you think that Labour holds all the answers and never makes
any mistakes, then there is no problem. But if like me you think that some
form of opposition scrutiny is important-however good the government might
be-then I urge you to be afraid. Be very, very afraid.

Shaun Bennett BA(Hons),MA
Defeated Independent candidate, Hollybush and Longton West